Note: This budget
update, prepared by an EISD parent, is posted to KEI with
permission.
From: Rich Egan
Sent: Saturday,
January 31, 2004 9:05 AM
Subject: January EISD Budget
Update
IF YOU WOULD
LIKE TO BE REMOVED FROM THIS EMAIL LIST PLEASE LET ME
KNOW
Updates were not sent in November and
December due to holiday demands. This month, meetings of note included a
finance committee meeting on 1/27 and a regular board meeting on 1/28.
This update will focus on the current activities as I am not sure that the
comments and issues raised the past months matter as much due to the
developments described below.
Summary
Big news is that the new permanent
Supertindent, Nola Wellman, has filled the role that interim Supt. Jess Butler
has been in approximately the last 1.5 years. She seems to have stepped
right in and appears to be quickly taking charge of the budget process. As
they say in the movies, there is a new sheriff in town. More on the
implications of this below. The last I heard, there was still
approximately $4.9 million in budget reductions/revenue enhancements needed for
the 04-05 budget. The fund balance at the end of this year (03-04) in
August 04 should be significantly more than anticipated last year with the total
being in the range of $18.9 million dollars. Supt. Wellman indicated that
she is recommending that the Board not close an elementary school this
year. A cautionary note on this, a demographic study by the District
projects an elementary enrollment decline of around 260 students over the next
five years. Campus staffing plans are being formulated this month by the
staff and administration. Perhaps the biggest changes may be at the middle
school level where scheduling changes for the number of class periods will
likely be implemented.
Details
Rather than summarize each meeting I will
summarize the events by topic. This is particularly appropriate as there
really was not much discussion by the Board on the budget at the Regular school
board meeting. The school board meeting ended at 9:40, beating by
approximately 1.5 hours the previously shortest regular board meeting in the
last 18 months. At least for now it appears that the Board may defer to
Supt. Wellman and the administration without a lot of micro-management. If
this holds up, this may be the most significant long-term development to come
out of January.
Fund
Balance
The outside accounting audit for 02-03 has
been certified and it indicates that the fund balance in August 2003 was
approximately $21.9 million. This is more than $3 million over what the
board had planned on during the budget discussions in the 02 Fall and 03
Spring. Slightly more than $3 million of this fund balance is targeted to
be used this year (03-04) as the current year budget is a deficit budget with
spending exceeding revenue by that amount. In past meetings the Board has
indicated a willingness to have the fund balance drop to at least $15 million
and there seems to be an expectation that a significant amount of fund balance
will be used to balance the upcoming 04-05 budget.
At the finance committee meeting it was
stated that the fund balance was significantly higher than planned for a number
of reasons. The biggest reasons were an accounting accrual issue and the
amount we ultimately had to pay the state last year under Robin Hood. The
accounting issue was a $1.1 million change due to a change in how the district
accrues for staff payroll liabilities. At a very high level, this has
something to do with changing from accrueing based on budgeted staff levels vs.
accrueing based on actual staff levels (particularly if positions go unfilled
throughout the year). In addition, the final Robin Hood payments
changed about $1.2 million dollars (final tax valuations play a big role in
this).
An on-going debate will be what level the fund balance
should drop to. It was noted by the district auditors at the finance
committee meeting that the TEA (Texas Education Agency) formulas would place the
optimal fund balance at $12.1 million.
Board member Ellen Balthazar questioned what goes into
the TEA formulas.
One of the outside accountants indicated that he had the
impression that the TEA guidelines were really geared to schools without
property wealth that were running low fund balances. He stated that he was
not sure if the numbers made sense for property wealthy districts that give
money to the state.
Supt. Wellman asked if there was a level at which if the
fund balance dropped below that level than the auditors would flag our fund
balance as a concern in an audit. The auditors said that they do not
really project where the fund balance should be operated at other than to flag
the number if district funds dropped so low that a serious concern of the
district entering bankruptcy was raised.
I’m sure we will hear more on how much fund balance will
be used in 04-05 over the next couple months.
Elementary School Closing and Enrollment
issues
Supt. Wellman stated that she will not bring a
recommendation to the board to close an elementary school this year. Supt.
Wellman stated that looking at the demographic studies indicates that this will
remain on the long term list of items to review for future years. She
indicated that some of her reasons for not closing a school included that the
fund balance offers some current flexibility and her desire to see what happens
in a special session on education funding expected to be called for by the
Governor this spring. Supt. Wellman in one meeting called this “a reprieve
for a time.”
A demographic study of district enrollments was
presented to the Board. The study indicated that elementary enrollment is
projected to be down 108 students next year and in five years down 260
students. Birth rate, census data, and housing data did not indicate an
increase in kindergarten enrollments in the near future. The study noted
that these drops were on top of a drop of 468 elementary students from
1999-2003.
[A personal observation: If nothing happens on the Robin
Hood front and the enrollment numbers show signs of following the projections,
then I suspect the closure issue will be dealt with in the coming years without
a lot of board debate]
Other Budget Issues
Supt. Wellman presented a budget development calendar
for creating the final budget by August. Campus staffing plans are to be
worked on this coming month. She indicated that staffing needs at each
campus are being identified based in part upon instructional and student
ratios. She indicated that there will be some staff shifting and some
staff reductions.
A major change at the middle schools appears to be the
change from 8 class periods to 7 class periods. Supt. Wellman said that
she will continue to meet with the middle school principals to finalize this
change.
Supt. Wellman indicated that she anticipates proposing a
deficit plan for 04-05 [i.e. fund balance will be used]. No mention was
made of how much fund balance the administration will propose to be
used.
Supt. Wellman indicated that a long term budget plan can
not rely on fund balance and that it must be recognized that when fund balance
is used it can not be used again.
Supt. Wellman presented a budget calendar that has most
of the activity happening this coming month with staffing plans and salary
schedules finalized in March/April. Thus, we are somewhat in a waiting
mode.
After the demographics, elementary school, and other
budget comments by Supt. Wellman, the Board literally said nothing.
The regular board meeting then wrapped up with some formalities.
A larger number than normal of district staff/administrators were present
at this time and many of them actually clapped.
[I got the sense that the EISD staff was excited to see
some long term permanent leadership since almost every major district position
is currently filled by “interim” staff. I heard one of our interim
administrators joke “we are the few, the proud, the interim.” I also
got the sense that the EISD staff was excited to see more deference (at least
for now) apparently given by the Board to the professional
educators.]
More to come next month as we see what shakes out.
Though cuts are coming, a least for now perhaps the process itself looks like it
will not be as painful as last year.