From: Rich Egan
[mailto:richegan@austin.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 10:31
PM
To: Forest Trail And Other
EISD Parents
Subject: EISD
March Budget Update
IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BE REMOVED FROM
THIS EMAIL LIST PLEASE LET ME KNOW
A
regular EISD school board meeting was held Wed. Feb. 25 and Wed. March 31.
A new breed of meeting a “Board Study Session” was held Wed. March
24th. Some of you have asked why there was no Feb. update – the
reason being that budget issues consumed about 45 secs. of that Board
meeting. I will first give a short summary of the fundamental changes that
have occurred in the management of EISD and the budget process. Then I
will provide a short summary of the substance of where we are at. Finally
I’ll give some details on various items of
interest.
The
New Management
As I
noted in January’s report the new Superintendent, Nola Wellman, was quickly
taking charge. She showed her first impact in January when she stated that
she was taking off all agendas the discussions on the merits of closing an
elementary school this year. [I sense that she will revisit this issue
next year when she has more time to evaluate the matter – I did not take this to
mean that she has an opinion on the substance of the matter – just that she
doesn’t want to discuss the merits as her arrival late in the year will not
allow her time to make a decision, thus, really rendering moot the need to start
at this time a discussion of the merits of the
idea]
Supt.
Wellman’s impact on governance of the district can be seen by the length of the
school board meetings. In Feb. and March both meetings ended at 9PM
(starting at 7:30PM). Since Sept. 2002 the shortest regular meeting that I
can remember lasted past 11PM. It seems clear that the EISD administration
is governing the district now and not the Board. Gone are the round and
round discussions about policy, procedures, budget items, building plans
etc. It appears to be a combination of a firm hand at the helm of the
district and the board’s willingness / confidence to let Supt. Wellman run
things. At least for now it looks like any micro-management by the Board
is a thing of the past.
As a
further indication of these changes, the old Board structure of committees
(Finance, Facilities, Program, etc.) is also gone. In the past, separate
Board committee meetings were held during the month to discuss in even more
detail the various areas within each committee’s scope. This has been
replaced by a full Board “Study Session.” The format of the study sessions
appears to be that several topics will be selected each month and the
Administration will present to the Board a status of the various matters.
Again, this appears to be the Administration informing the Board of what is
going on as opposed to the Board deciding all
issues.
[In my
opinion it seems clear that the EISD Administration will be calling the
shots. The impact of this will be that there will be less discussion in
public of the various issues because Board debate was generally required by law
to be in a public forum. Though some may not like this, the end result is
that the professional educators that we hire will be making most of the
decisions. We may not like all of the decisions and we may not feel that
we have as much input as before, however, with regard to decisions that I may
disagree with I think I will feel more comfortable if the decision was made by
the professional staff]
So
What Is Going On
Supt.
Wellman has a Budget development calendar in place. Big ticket items that
seem to be baseline assumptions that the administration is working from are that
there will be a need of about $2.47 million in budget savings (i.e. cuts or more
revenue from somewhere) and about $1.5 million in fund balance available for
use. This compares with the 2003-04 budget which needed $8 million in cuts
and $3 million in fund balance.
Currently each school is preparing a staffing plan based
on “instructional ratios.” This means that the total staff – teachers,
teacher aids, counselor, nurse, secretaries, etc. (excluding some areas such as
special ed) to student ratio is set for each level (elementary, middle school
and high school). I can’t remember the numbers but it was something like
14.5:1 at elementary; 15:1 at middle school and 16:1 at high school. Each
campus will then submit recommendations as how to best allocate the staff
resources amongst the various tasks for each campus. These recommendations
I believe are suppose to be reported by the Administration by April. I
have heard that this could mean about 45-50 position cuts district wide.
For example, at Forest Trail I have heard projections that this could be upward
to 3 positions depending upon the enrollment and transfer student
numbers.
The
last calendar I saw indicated that campus staffing plans would be finalize in
April along with proposed salary schedules and a review of expense/revenue
projections. Preliminary tax appraisal data is to be received in May and
revised revenue and expense estimates made at that time. Budget workshops
and final revisions would then carry into June.
Various Details
From
the Board Study Session:
The
district now has a permanent Asst. Supt. of Business Affairs (finance), Susan
P_____, unfortunately I did not copy down her last name. Tom
Zimmerer who filled that role on an interim basis came back for this meeting to
help with the transition to Susan. In his typical self, Tom cut to the
chase on some of the vagaries of the Robin Hood rules by noting about our
esteemed legislators – “They were all smoking dope when they set up the Robin
Hood rules.”
Next
year’s tax rate will drop about 10-11 cents due to a drop in the portion of the
tax for the bond debt.
The
Eanes Education Foundation (EEF) will organize a Keep Eanes Exemplary campaign
seeking cash donations taking over the campaign that the School Board organized
last year that raised about $350,000.
Approximately 130 new transfer students (students not in
the program this year) have applied already for next
year.
Topics
for the April Study Session include middle school schedules, bond project
updates, security needs at the school campuses, and a potential survey of some
form to get feedback from within the district.
From
the March Regular Board Meeting:
A
revenue generation task force is being proposed to consist of a variety of
citizens to analyze revenue enhancement ideas.
Latin
in the middle schools: It was stated that the number of students that
requested Latin will drive whether it is kept at each school. The big question
being Latin at 7th grade. Supt. Wellman stated that the
District can not afford to have exceeding small classes. [I have heard at other
meetings that the number of students that signed up at West Ridge will allow for
a 7th grade class but that only 7 kids signed up for 7th
grade class at Hill Country so it will not be offered there – anyone out there
that is a Hill Country parent ought to check into this because I have heard from
some Hill Country parents that the parents were not aware that Latin was
available as a choice]
Supt.
Wellman said that when the administrators propose their staffing projections and
budgetary cuts, there will be an opportunity for the public to comment.
Board member Ellen Balthazar noted that last year a good deal of the budge
process was done by the Board and that this year the process is being driven by
the administration and individual Campus Leadership
Teams.
From
The Feb. Regular Board Meeting
A
presentation of was made regarding the district transfer policy. It was
noted that generally when evaluating a transfer student EISD can only consider a
student’s attendance and disciplinary records and the space availability at a
particular school/ program. It was noted that a survey of the relatively
small number of transfers in 2003-03 showed slightly lower TAKS scores, better
attendance and less discipline referrals. It was noted that the number of
students in the program at that time made the numbers almost statistically
insignificant. The larger numbers from 2003-04 should give more
data.
Finally, a note to the English majors out there – I am
not one of you. In addition, I do occasionally hit “send” before
“spell-check”